【摘要】：隨著現代福利國家的建立，服務行政、給付行政在行政活動中的比重日益增大，行政權力突破了以往的消極作為，使得行政領地得以極大的擴張。在向積極給付國家路徑演進的過程中，公物作為行政主體實施行政活動的重要手段，具有十分重要的意義和價值。公物及其制度已經成為行政法研究的一個重要方向，對公物及其理論的研究也是解決公物管理、合法利用、公物致害損害賠償等一系列實務問題的基礎，對防止公物占用，打擊貪污腐敗，，保障公民公物利用權具有重要作用。然而，我國卻長期漠視公物的理論研究，缺乏成熟的公物理論和完善的公物制度，又沒有相關立法的有效規范，這不能不說是我國行政法學界的一大憾事。 本文從行政法視角下對公物利用進行研究，首先從公物與公物利用概述入手，對公物的概念、法律特征、分類以及公物利用的概念、方式、原則等方面進行了介紹。其次，探討了公物利用的理論依據，在介紹法國、德國等域外主要國家的公物利用理論的演變的基礎上，對我國公物利用理論的基礎進行了初步探索，從而試圖構建符合我國國情的公物利用理論基礎。再次，由于公物最大的價值就在于其能被公眾所廣泛使用，最大限度地實現公共利益，因此本文選擇以公物利用關系為切入點，試圖對公物利用關系中的各種權利義務作出剖析，這不僅有利于厘清具體的權利義務，還有助于規范行政主體在公物領域的活動。最后，介紹了公物利用的侵權與救濟，通過分析公物利用的侵權表現，運用類型化分析法對公物糾紛的類型進行具體闡述，進而根據公物糾紛的具體性質確定對公物利用人的權利救濟方式。由于公物利用的本質是為公眾提供公物使用，提高全民福祉，因此出于更好地保障利用人的權益、監督和制約公權力的目的，應當將糾紛納入公法救濟的渠道中。
[Abstract]:With the establishment of the modern welfare state, the proportion of service administration and payment administration in administrative activities is increasing day by day. The administrative power breaks through the past negative acts and makes the administrative territory expand greatly. In the course of the evolution to the active payment of the national path, public property, as an important means of implementing administrative activities, is of great significance and value. Public property and its system have become an important direction in the study of administrative law. The study of public property and its theory is also the basis for solving a series of practical problems such as management of public property, legal utilization, compensation for damage caused by public property, and prevention of occupation of public property. Fighting corruption and protecting citizens' right to use public property play an important role. However, our country has long ignored the theoretical study of public property, lack of mature public property theory and perfect public property system, and there is no effective regulation of relevant legislation, which can not be said to be a great pity in the field of administrative law of our country. This paper studies the use of public property from the perspective of administrative law. Firstly, it introduces the concept, legal characteristics, classification, concept, methods and principles of the use of public property from the perspective of public property and public property utilization. Secondly, the theoretical basis of public property utilization is discussed. On the basis of introducing the evolution of the theory of public property utilization in France, Germany and other major foreign countries, the paper makes a preliminary exploration on the basis of the theory of public property utilization in China. In order to build a theoretical basis for the use of public property in accordance with the national conditions of our country. Thirdly, because the greatest value of public property is that it can be widely used by the public and realize the public interest to the maximum extent, so this paper chooses the relationship of public property utilization as the starting point. This paper attempts to analyze all kinds of rights and obligations in the relations of public property utilization, which is not only helpful to clarify the specific rights and obligations, but also to standardize the activities of administrative subjects in the field of public property. Finally, it introduces the tort and relief of the public property utilization, through the analysis of the tort performance of the public property use, uses the typology analysis method to elaborate the type of the public property dispute in detail. Then according to the specific nature of the public property dispute to determine the public property rights relief. Because the essence of public property utilization is to provide the public with public property use and to improve the welfare of the whole people, the disputes should be brought into the channels of public law relief for the purpose of better protecting the rights and interests of the users and supervising and restricting the public power.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 周剛志;;公物概念及其在我國的適用——兼析《物權法草案(征求意見稿)》相關條款[J];現代法學;2006年04期

2 劉麗萍;行政法上的物權初探[J];政法論壇;2003年03期

3 侯宇;;“風光”所有權歸屬之憲法學辨析——以《黑龍江省氣候資源探測與保護條例》為例[J];中共浙江省委黨校學報;2013年04期

本文編號：2141521