本文關鍵詞：“營改增”對我國金融業稅負的影響　出處：《首都經濟貿易大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 增值稅 稅負 上市銀行 證券公司

【摘要】：2016年3月18日國務院決議,從2016年5月1日起,在全國范圍內對金融業、房地產業、建筑業、生活服務業由原征收營業稅改為征收增值稅。至此,持續5年的營改增進程正式迎來最后的收官戰。金融業由于業務的復雜性,是此次試點推廣的重頭戲。相比營業稅,增值稅從原理上可以避免重復征稅,具有稅收中性的優點。本文旨在全面推行“營改增”的背景下,測算這一稅制改革對金融業實際稅負的影響具有重要意義。根據新的稅收政策變化,為金融業更好開展業務提供建議。本文運用最新營改增政策,結合16家上市銀行、14家證券公司2015年年報數進行模擬測算營改增后金融業稅負的變化。其中,銀行分為貸款類服務、直接收費金融服務、投資業務三大類分別進行了稅負測算,營改增后若只考慮單獨稅負有所上升;結合不動產、業務支出等進項抵扣后,16家銀行整體稅負率下降,個體稅負變化的范圍在-0.83%到0.08%。“營改增”對各券商稅負總體影響不大,總體稅負有升有降,幅度在-0.22%-0.38%,“減免項目占比較高、可抵進項數額較大”是券商受益“營改增”的主要原因。最后提出業務拆分、業務外包、債轉股等政策建議,促使我國金融業更好的發展。
[Abstract]:In March 18th 2016, the State Council resolution, from May 1st 2016, in the national financial industry, real estate, construction. The life service industry changed from the original business tax to the value added tax. So far, the 5-year process of business reform formally ushered in the final official battle. The financial industry due to the complexity of the business. Compared with business tax, VAT can avoid repeated taxation in principle and has the advantage of tax neutrality. This paper aims to carry out "business reform and increase" in an all-round way. It is of great significance to measure the impact of the tax system reform on the actual tax burden of the financial industry. According to the new tax policy changes, the paper provides advice for the financial industry to better carry out business. This paper uses the latest reform and increase policy. Combined with 16 listed banks 14 securities companies in 2015 to simulate the number of annual reports after the change of the financial industry tax changes. Among them banks are divided into loan services directly charged financial services. The three major categories of investment business have been measured and calculated respectively, and the tax burden has been increased if only a separate tax burden has been considered after the increase of the business operation. Combined with real estate, business expenses and other input credit after the overall tax burden of 16 banks fell. The change range of individual tax burden is from -0.83% to 0.08%. The "business reform and increase" has little effect on the overall tax burden of the securities companies, and the overall tax burden has increased or decreased, with a range of -0.22% -0.38%. It is the main reason for the securities companies to benefit from the large amount of deductible items. Finally, some policy suggestions such as business separation, business outsourcing and debt-to-equity conversion are put forward. To promote the better development of our financial industry.
【學位授予單位】：首都經濟貿易大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F812.42;F830.42

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 魏志華;夏永哲;;金融業“營改增”的稅負影響及政策選擇——基于兩種征稅模式的對比研究[J];經濟學動態;2015年08期

2 王玲;;探析營改增對金融業的影響[J];財經界(學術版);2015年07期

3 熊鷺;;金融業營改增中的問題[J];中國金融;2014年03期

4 周剛;;營業稅改增值稅對銀行業的影響研究——基于寧波銀行的相關數據分析[J];金融會計;2013年10期

5 劉天永;;金融業營業稅改征增值稅計稅方法問題的研析[J];稅務研究;2013年04期

6 尹音頻;魏_g;;我國保險業流轉稅稅負的比較與思考[J];稅務研究;2012年11期

7 杜莉;張蘇予;;增值稅擴圍對金融業貨物勞務稅負擔的影響[J];稅務研究;2011年10期

8 鄧子基;習甜;;對我國金融服務業改征增值稅的探討[J];涉外稅務;2011年04期

9 馬恩濤;;金融服務業增值稅征收問題的思考[J];稅務研究;2010年09期

10 張丹丹;金融業流轉稅制改革的方案選擇[J];黑龍江對外經貿;2005年10期

，

本文編號：1425446