【摘要】："杏壇"是傳說中孔子聚徒講學的地方。關于其"杏"字所指,目前有兩種提法,一說為杏樹,一說為銀杏,而銀杏說在輿論上占據主流。考諸典籍及前人研究成果,"杏壇"原只是一個傳說,南朝后學者始將其作為文獻典故,并未視為歷史實存,真正的"杏壇",為宋金之時所確立,而當時的"杏壇"之"杏"本指杏樹,而非銀杏。近年來"銀杏說"之所以愈演愈烈,除了與《孔子傳》這部人物傳記為杏壇命名賦予了銀杏象征意義,從而造成廣泛影響有關外,也與我國興起的發展銀杏經濟、宣傳銀杏文化的浪潮密不可分。糾"銀杏"之誤傳,還"杏壇"本相,可防止繼續以訛傳訛。
[Abstract]:Xingtan is the legendary place where Confucius gathered and lectured. At present, there are two kinds of references to the word "apricot", one is apricot tree and the other is ginkgo biloba, which occupies the mainstream in public opinion. After the Southern Dynasty, scholars began to regard it as a literature and allusions, and did not regard it as a historical fact. The real "apricot altar" was established in the Song and Jin dynasties, and it was established by the Song and Jin dynasties, "Xingtan" was originally just a legend, and the "apricot altar" was established at the time of the Song and Jin dynasties. And then "apricot altar" apricot "refers to apricot tree, not ginkgo. In recent years, the reason why "Ginkgo Theory" has become more and more fierce is not only related to the symbolic meaning given to Xingtan by the biography of Confucius, which has caused extensive influence, but also to the development of ginkgo economy in our country. The wave of propagandizing ginkgo culture is inextricably linked. Correcting the misstatement of Ginkgo biloba, and also the apricot altar, can prevent the continuation of false transmission.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學岳麓書院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“中國‘四書’學史”(項目編號:13&ZD060)系列成果之一
【分類號】：I206.2;K22
，

本文編號：2472138