本文選題：Dickman沖動量表 + 他評　； 參考：《大連醫科大學》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 研究背景:自殺(suicide)是現代社會人類的10大死因之一,并已經成為15-35歲間的年輕人前3位的死因。關于自殺的原因有很多種,但沖動性是一個不可忽視的因素。目前關于沖動的研究樣本很多只是局限在自殺未遂和正常人群中,用自殺死亡群體做關于沖動的研究很少,但是用自殺死亡群體做關于沖動的研究最具有說服力。自殺死亡的研究需要心理解剖,而心理解剖方法則需要他評版的心理測量工具。 研究目的:本研究旨在修訂Dickman沖動量表( Dickman’s Impulsivity Inventory,DII)他評版,在中國東北農村社會文化背景下,通過對DII他評版信度、效度的檢驗,對在農村自殺死亡的危險因素進行初步驗證性研究。到目前為止此類量表還未見他評版本,所以此次修訂為探索性的研究。 研究方法:隨機抽取大連地區莊河農村居民及整群抽取莊河農村2006年6月1日-2008年6月30日自殺死亡病例作為研究對象,進行量表的修訂及檢驗。量表修訂程序為(1)在DII正式測驗版的基礎上對措辭進行修改調整,形成DII他評預測版;(2)將DII他評預測版應用于預實驗組的102例農村居民,測驗的結果經項目分析后篩選出不合適的題目,對其進行翻譯的調整,形成DII他評正式測驗版;(3)將DII他評正式測驗版施測于參與正式測驗的258例農村居民,測驗結果經項目分析和因子分析后刪除不合適的題目,形成DII他評版;(4)隨機抽取參加正式施測的258例農村居民中的52例,于4周后進行重測,以檢驗量表的重測信度;(5)對DII他評版進行內部一致性信度檢驗。(6)通過對自殺死亡病例及對照組施測,進行初步驗證性研究,檢驗DII他評版的區分效度。 研究結果:(1)預實驗的結果顯示D5、D7、D18、D20的臨界比小于3,并且相關系數得分低于0.3,經過修改調整后,在正式測驗的項目分析后刪除了鑒別度仍較低的D18;并且將因子分析中兩個結果與所測驗的目的相反的項目進行交換。(2)DII他評版的信度結果顯示本量表具有良好的內部一致性和穩定性,其中,總量表和非功能性與功能性沖動分量表的Cronbach’sα系數分別為0.8795,0.8626,0.8387,分半信度分別為0.8852,0.8352,0.8320,重測信度為0.870;(3)效度分析,結構效度是通過因子分析進行檢驗,結果支持DII他評版的非功能性與功能性沖動的理論建構;區分效度是對農村自殺人群和與之配對的農村正常人群進行相關分析,結果表明自殺組顯著高于對照組,說明DII他評版有區分不同屬性人群的能力,具有較好的區分效度。 研究結論:DII他評版具有較好的信度和效度,符合心理測量學的要求。DII他評版可用于對農村自殺死亡危險因素的分析,也可用于農村的沖動性人格研究。
[Abstract]:Background: suicide is one of the 10 leading causes of death in modern society and has become the top three causes of death among young people aged 15-35. There are many reasons for suicide, but impulsiveness is a factor that cannot be ignored. At present, a lot of research samples about impulse are confined to attempted suicide and normal population. There are few studies on impulse in suicide death group, but it is most persuasive to use suicide death group to do impulse research. The research of suicide death requires psychological anatomy, and psychological anatomy method requires his psychological measurement tool. Objective: the purpose of this study was to revise the Dickman impulse scale (Dickman's Impulsivity inventor DII), and to test the reliability and validity of DII evaluation under the social and cultural background of rural areas in Northeast China. The risk factors of suicide death in rural areas were preliminarily verified. So far, he has not seen a version of the scale, so this revision is an exploratory study. Methods: random sampling of Zhuanghe rural residents in Dalian area and cluster sampling of Zhuanghe rural areas from June 1, 2006 to June 30, 2008, as research objects, the scale was revised and tested. The revised procedure of the scale was: (1) on the basis of the formal test version of DII, the wording was revised and adjusted to form the DII other assessment prediction version, which was applied to 102 rural residents in the pre-experimental group. After item analysis, the results of the test were selected out and the unsuitable questions were selected, and the translation was adjusted to form the DII he evaluation formal test version. (3) the DII other evaluation formal test version was applied to 258 rural residents who participated in the formal test. After item analysis and factor analysis, the results of the test were used to remove the inappropriate questions and form a DII other evaluation page. 52 of 258 rural residents who took part in the formal survey were randomly selected and re-tested 4 weeks later. To test the reliability of internal consistency of DII's other evaluation version by using the test-retest reliability of test scale / 5) to test the distinguishing validity of DII's other evaluation edition by means of a preliminary confirmatory study on the suicide death cases and the control group. The critical ratio of D _ 5 / D _ 7 / D _ (18) D _ (20) is less than 3, and the score of correlation coefficient is lower than 0.3. After the item analysis of the formal test, D18, which is still low, was deleted; and the reliability of the scale was shown to be good by exchanging two items in factor analysis that were opposite to the purpose of the test. Ministry consistency and stability, Among them, the Cronbach's 偽 coefficients of total table and non-functional and functional impulse component tables were 0.879 5 / 0.8626 / 0.8387, the split-half reliability were 0.8852 / 2 / 0.8352 / 0.8320, and the test-retest reliability were 0.870 / 3, respectively. The structural validity was tested by factor analysis. Results the results supported the theoretical construction of non-functional and functional impulses in DII's evaluation version. The distinguishing validity was to analyze the correlation between rural suicide population and matched rural normal population. The results showed that the suicide group was significantly higher than the control group. It shows that DII has the ability to distinguish different attribute groups, and has good distinguishing validity. Conclusion: DII / DII has good reliability and validity. It can be used to analyze the risk factors of suicide death in rural areas and to study impulsive personality in rural areas.
【學位授予單位】：大連醫科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：B846

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 林琳;15-35歲農村青年沖動性人格特質與自殺死亡關系的病例對照研究[D];大連醫科大學;2011年

2 叢文;農村高低計劃自殺死亡者不同特點的心理解剖研究[D];大連醫科大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1981760