本文關(guān)鍵詞： 政府律師 政府法制機(jī)構(gòu) 法治政府　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：政府律師制度的完善,是我國法治政府建設(shè)的內(nèi)在需要,也是當(dāng)前深入推進(jìn)依法行政的現(xiàn)實(shí)選擇。法治政府的建設(shè)需要政府律師參與政府履行職責(zé)的各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié),提升政府依法行政的整體水平和社會(huì)公信力。我國自2002年開展政府律師制度試點(diǎn)工作,由于制度設(shè)計(jì)沒有妥善解決與現(xiàn)行行政管理架構(gòu)、公務(wù)員管理與律師管理制度銜接的問題,導(dǎo)致政府律師法律地位始終模糊,以至于試點(diǎn)工作也推行不暢,甚至引起對政府律師存廢的質(zhì)疑。鑒于此,對相關(guān)制度的完善進(jìn)行研究,以切實(shí)發(fā)揮政府律師作用,提升政府律師地位,使我國的政府律師制度重新煥發(fā)生機(jī),具有理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文分三個(gè)部分對我國政府律師制度的完善進(jìn)行了研究。首先,對政府律師制度的源起、沿革以及我國政府律師制度現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了介紹,并重點(diǎn)對法治政府建設(shè)中在我國設(shè)立政府律師的必要性進(jìn)行了認(rèn)真分析,以駁斥認(rèn)識(shí)上的否定和懷疑之說。其次,則具體分析了我國政府律師制度存在的主要問題及原因,包括：政府律師制度尚沒有得到《律師法》的確認(rèn)；職責(zé)定位與政府法制機(jī)構(gòu)職責(zé)的沖突；兼具律師與公務(wù)員的雙重身份,實(shí)行所在單位、司法行政機(jī)關(guān)、律師協(xié)會(huì)三方管理的模式,沒有與公務(wù)員管理制度有效結(jié)合,政府律師身份無從體現(xiàn)、執(zhí)業(yè)獨(dú)立性無法保障；激勵(lì)機(jī)制匱乏。最后,則針對存在的問題提出了完善我國政府律師制度的建議：在立法確定政府律師法律地位的前提下,建立政府律師身份的定向賦予制度、合理界定職責(zé)范圍、提升其待遇并優(yōu)化管理方式。 本文強(qiáng)調(diào),完善我國的政府律師制度,必須充分考慮與政府法制機(jī)構(gòu)的銜接,妥善處理好兩者之間的關(guān)系。在政府律師身份方面,可以定向賦予政府法制機(jī)構(gòu)工作人員；在職責(zé)界定方面,應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合政府法制機(jī)構(gòu)專業(yè)化建設(shè)進(jìn)度,考慮界定一致或者界定為專業(yè)性法律事務(wù),并對其履行職責(zé)提供制度保障；在待遇提升上,應(yīng)當(dāng)建立合理的薪酬制度和優(yōu)先晉升機(jī)制,完善職稱制度并保持適度的流動(dòng)性,同時(shí)提供更多的工作鍛煉機(jī)會(huì)和學(xué)習(xí)培訓(xùn)機(jī)會(huì)；在管理方式上,應(yīng)當(dāng)構(gòu)建合理高效的政府律師管理體制,并制定專門的政府律師執(zhí)業(yè)行為規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The perfection of the government lawyer system is the internal need of the construction of the government ruled by law in our country, and it is also the realistic choice to advance the administration by law. The construction of the government by law requires the government lawyers to participate in each link of the government to perform its duties. Improve the overall level of government administration according to law and social credibility. Since 2002, our government lawyer system pilot work, due to the system design has not been properly resolved with the current administrative structure. The problem of the connection between the civil servant management and the lawyer management system leads to the blur of the legal status of the government lawyer all the time, so that the pilot work is also implemented unobstructed, and even raises the question of the retention or abolition of the government lawyer. In view of this. It is of theoretical and practical significance to study the perfection of relevant systems in order to give full play to the role of government lawyers, to promote the status of government lawyers, and to rejuvenate the system of government lawyers in our country. This paper is divided into three parts to study the perfection of our government lawyer system. First of all, the origin of the government lawyer system, evolution and the current situation of our government lawyer system are introduced. And focus on the rule of law government in the construction of the necessity of setting up a government lawyer in our country, in order to refute the cognitive negation and doubt. Secondly. Then it analyzes the main problems and reasons of our government lawyer system, including: the government lawyer system has not been confirmed by the lawyers Law; The conflict between the duty orientation and the responsibility of the government legal institutions; The dual identity of both lawyers and civil servants, the implementation of the unit, judicial administrative organs, bar associations of the three-way management model, without effective integration with the civil service management system, the identity of government lawyers can not be reflected. The independence of practice cannot be guaranteed; Finally, in view of the existing problems, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the system of government lawyers: on the premise of legislation to determine the legal status of government lawyers, it establishes the system of orientation and endowing of the identity of government lawyers. Define the scope of responsibilities, improve their treatment and optimize management. This paper emphasizes that in order to perfect our government lawyer system, we must fully consider the connection with the government legal system and properly handle the relationship between them. The staff of the legal institutions of the government can be assigned to them; In the aspect of defining responsibilities, we should consider the definition of consistent or professional legal affairs in combination with the progress of the specialization construction of government legal institutions, and provide system guarantee for the performance of their duties. On the promotion of treatment, we should establish a reasonable salary system and preferential promotion mechanism, perfect the title system and maintain the appropriate mobility, at the same time, provide more work training opportunities and learning and training opportunities; In terms of management mode, we should construct a reasonable and efficient government lawyer management system, and formulate a special code of practice for government lawyers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 嚴(yán)軍興;政府律師的性質(zhì)及職責(zé)[J];中國司法;2004年09期

2 高志強(qiáng);廣州公職律師機(jī)制的理論探索[J];中國司法;2005年06期

3 張文靜;周軍;蔡俊敏;;2007年公職律師理論與實(shí)踐研討會(huì)會(huì)議綜述[J];中國司法;2007年09期

4 王保安;關(guān)晨霞;;中國公職律師制度研究[J];中國司法;2008年07期

5 闞肖虹;;“政府雇員”——揚(yáng)州公職律師模式的探索與思考[J];中國司法;2009年11期

6 劉瑞蘭;;我國公職律師制度的建設(shè)與完善[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 楊毓根;;我國政府律師制度的現(xiàn)狀及對策探討[J];法治研究;2010年06期

8 孫燕山;中美律師制度比較及我國律師制度的完善[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

9 閆博慧;;論如何完善政府律師制度[J];河北學(xué)刊;2010年05期

10 呂錫偉,張興祥;淺談設(shè)立政府律師問題[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1483067