【摘要】：在《刑法修正案(八)》禁止令入刑的基礎上,《刑法修正案(九)》關于從業禁止的規定客觀上進一步強化了我國刑法的預防性措施,促進了我國刑事制裁體系和行政制裁體系的結構性調整。但《刑法修正案(九)》關于從業禁止的規定也造成了從業禁止制度與我國犯罪二元結構、刑罰體系、預防措施體系和行政性從業禁止體系的結構性矛盾,打亂了已有法律制裁體系的平衡結構。我國應當在從業禁止制度現有立法的基礎之上,提升從業禁止的刑法地位,將從業禁止措施規定為資格刑,并進一步明確職業的范圍和從業禁止的期限,積極推動我國刑事制裁體系的結構優化和功能完善。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the Criminal Law Amendment (8), the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) on the prohibition of employment have objectively strengthened the preventive measures of the criminal law of our country and promoted the structural adjustment of the criminal sanctions system and the administrative sanctions system of our country. However, the provisions on employment prohibition in Amendment (9) of the Criminal Law have also caused structural contradictions between the employment prohibition system and the dual structure of crime, penalty system, preventive measures system and administrative employment prohibition system in China, thus disrupting the balance structure of the existing legal sanctions system. On the basis of the existing legislation of the employment prohibition system, our country should improve the status of the criminal law of the employment prohibition, stipulate the prohibition measures as the qualification penalty, further clarify the scope of the occupation and the duration of the employment prohibition, and actively promote the structure optimization and function perfection of the criminal sanctions system of our country.
，

本文編號：2526635