【摘要】：本文在理論研究的范疇內(nèi),從藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)關(guān)系為大的前提出發(fā),結(jié)合目前我國(guó)藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)過(guò)程中的一些問(wèn)題,在廣義上對(duì)藝術(shù)品的概念進(jìn)行整理和概括,指明藝術(shù)品應(yīng)該具備的特征。從藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)人與委托人和買(mǎi)受人的法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行歸納和整理,分析藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)法律關(guān)系的實(shí)質(zhì)和主要特征,明確藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)人和委托人之間委托合同的隱名代理性質(zhì)。在理論的范疇清晰的闡述藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)理論的內(nèi)容,為后續(xù)的研究做理論的鋪墊。 在中后的章節(jié)中依然從我國(guó)藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)條款出發(fā),從其擔(dān)保免責(zé)的內(nèi)涵到使用情況乃至對(duì)使用情況的質(zhì)疑幾個(gè)方面對(duì)目前的瑕疵擔(dān)保免責(zé)條款進(jìn)行分析和整理,指出目前瑕疵擔(dān)保免責(zé)理論的不足之處。在國(guó)外的理論研究上,韓國(guó)、英國(guó)、美國(guó)為典型,闡述上述幾個(gè)國(guó)家在相關(guān)立法上和實(shí)踐中采取的與我國(guó)的不同的法律法規(guī)與措施,并進(jìn)行評(píng)析,以期達(dá)到借鑒和學(xué)習(xí)的目的。最后的完善相關(guān)的建議中,主要從立法改善以及相關(guān)措施處罰,重點(diǎn)引入介紹藝術(shù)品擔(dān)保金制度和行業(yè)鑒定委員會(huì)的設(shè)立,綜合了各個(gè)方面的考量,希望對(duì)我國(guó)的藝術(shù)品瑕疵擔(dān)保免責(zé)條款的改進(jìn)有所幫助和改良。 本文分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分是對(duì)藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)該課題的由來(lái)、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究的范圍和方法進(jìn)行概述說(shuō)明。 第二部分為藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)相關(guān)法律關(guān)系的概述,了解藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)中的拍賣(mài)法律關(guān)系中相應(yīng)的特點(diǎn)。 第三部分為藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)條款的研究分析總結(jié)拍賣(mài)法第六十一條,進(jìn)行否定,進(jìn)而闡明藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)人瑕疵免責(zé)條款的不合理性。 第四部分為國(guó)外藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)的規(guī)制,介紹了英國(guó)、美國(guó)、司法實(shí)踐和經(jīng)驗(yàn)做法,并第一次引入了韓國(guó)有關(guān)瑕疵擔(dān)保的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)。 第五部分是藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保免責(zé)責(zé)任的完善意見(jiàn),從對(duì)我國(guó)目前現(xiàn)行的拍賣(mài)法及相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的改良處罰,完善行業(yè)自治體系,在新時(shí)期下以淘寶藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)為典型,對(duì)新型網(wǎng)絡(luò)藝術(shù)品拍賣(mài)總結(jié),提出藝術(shù)品瑕疵的拍賣(mài)擔(dān)保金的制度。
[Abstract]:In the scope of theoretical research, from the premise of art auction relationship, combining with some problems in the process of art auction in our country at present, this paper arranges and generalizes the concept of art in a broad sense. Specify the characteristics of an art object. This paper summarizes and arranges the legal relationship between the auctioneer and the consignor and the buyer, analyzes the essence and main features of the legal relationship of the art auction, and clarifies the anonymous agency nature of the entrustment contract between the auctioneer and the consignor. In the theoretical category, the clear elaboration of the art defects auction warranty exemption theory content, for the subsequent research to do the theoretical groundwork. In the middle and later chapters, we still proceed from the auction guarantee exemption clause of our country's works of art flaw, analyze and sort out the current defect guarantee exemption clause from the connotation of its guarantee exemption to the usage and even the doubt of the usage. This paper points out the deficiency of the theory of disclaimer of defect guarantee at present. In the theoretical research of foreign countries, Korea, Britain and the United States are typical. This paper expounds the different laws and regulations and measures adopted by these countries in the relevant legislation and practice, and evaluates them in order to achieve the purpose of reference and study. In the final consummation related suggestion, mainly from the legislative improvement and the related measure punishment, introduces the introduction art guarantee fund system and the establishment of the industry appraisal committee, synthesizes each aspect consideration, The author hopes to improve the disclaimer clause of art defects in our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is about the origin of the subject, the research status, the scope and methods of the research. The second part is an overview of the legal relationship related to the auction guarantee exemption of the defects of art, understanding the corresponding characteristics of the auction legal relationship in the art auction. The third part is the research and analysis of the exemption clause of the auction guarantee for the defect of works of art. The article 61 of the auction law is summarized and negated, and then the irrationality of the exemption clause of the defect of the art auctioneer is clarified. The fourth part is the regulation of auction guarantee exemption for foreign art auction defects. It introduces the British, American, judicial practice and experience practice, and introduces the relevant laws and regulations of Korea for the first time. The fifth part is the perfection of the exemption responsibility of the auction guarantee for the defects of works of art, from the current auction law and related laws and regulations of our country to improve punishment, perfect the system of industry autonomy, in the new period, Taobao art auction as a typical, This paper summarizes the new network art auction, and puts forward the system of the auction guarantee for the defects of works of art.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294;D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 劉寧元;;論構(gòu)建我國(guó)拍賣(mài)法律制度的若干問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2007年06期

2 崔建遠(yuǎn);;中國(guó)債法的現(xiàn)狀與未來(lái)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年01期

3 和靜鈞;;境外拍賣(mài)法律規(guī)范與啟示[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2007年02期

4 宋勝春;;淺析“按現(xiàn)狀拍賣(mài)”規(guī)則[J];中國(guó)拍賣(mài);2006年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2140280